Kompetensi Mahkamah Syari’ah Dalam Menangani Perkara Ekonomi Syari’ah
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.61842/swq/v1i1.2
Keywords:
ekonomi syariah kompetensi mahkamah syari'ah
Abstract
This article aims to investigate the competence of the Religious Courts in handling Islamic Economic cases. A significant change that recently occurred is the expansion of the Religious Court's jurisdiction in accordance with Law No. 3 of 2006, particularly concerning the handling of Islamic Economic cases in Indonesia. The Religious Courts are now authorized to handle cases related to Islamic financial services, including Islamic banking disputes. This amendment not only broadens the authority of the Religious Courts but also provides a clear scope for Islamic economic disputes. The scope extends beyond banking issues to include Islamic microfinance institutions, Islamic insurance, reinsurance, Islamic mutual funds, Islamic bonds, medium-term Islamic securities, Islamic securities, Islamic multifinance, Islamic pawnshops, and other Islamic financial institutions and businesses.
References
Gita Danupranata, Ekonomi Islam, cetakan I, Yogyakarta : UPFE-UMY,2006
Monser Kahf, Deskripsi Ekonomi Islam. Terj: Rifyal Ka’bah, Jakarta: Minaret, 1987
Rifyal Ka'bah, Penyelesaian Sengketa Ekonomi Syari'ah Sebagai Sebuah Kewenangan Baru Mahkamah syariah, dalam Varia Peradilan . tahun ke XXI, NOMOR245 April, 2006
Retnowulan Sutantio, Hukum Acara Pedata Dalam Teori dan Praktek, Bandung: Mandar Maju, 1989
Undang-undang No. 18 Tahun 2001 tentang Otonomi Khusus Bagi Provinsi Daerah Istimewa Aceh Sebagai Provinsi Nanggroe Aceh Darussalam
Undang-Undang Nomor 3 Tahun 2006
Undang-Undang Nomor 4 Tahun 2004 tentang Kekuasaan Kehakiman.
Undang-Undang Nomor 7 Tahun 1989 tentang Mahkamah syariah
UU No 3 Tahun 2006, tentang Perubahan atas Undang-Undang Nomor 7 Tahun 1989 tentang Mahkamah syariah
Yusuf Buchori, Litigasi Sengketa Perbankan Syari’ah Dalam Persektif Undang-Undang Nomor 3 Tahun 2006 Tentang Perubahan Atas Undang-Undang Nomor 7 tahun 1989 Tentang Mahkamah syariah (Study Kasus Putusan Pada Mahkamah syari’ah Purbalingga)” , Tesis MSI-UII Yogyakarta, 2007,
Downloads
Published
2023-06-05
Statistic
-
Read Counter : 219
Download : 198
Download data is not yet available.
Issue
Section
Articles
How to Cite
Nazaruddin Nazaruddin. (2023). Kompetensi Mahkamah Syari’ah Dalam Menangani Perkara Ekonomi Syari’ah. Siyasah Wa Qanuniyah : Jurnal Ilmiah Ma’had Aly Raudhatul Ma’arif, 1(1), 49–61. https://doi.org/10.61842/swq/v1i1.2
License
Copyright (c) 2023 Nazaruddin Nazaruddin
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
You are accessible to:
Share — copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format
Adapt — remix, transform, and build upon the material for any purpose, even commercially
Under the following terms:
Attribution — You must give appropriate credit, provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made. You may do so reasonably but not in any way that suggests the licensor endorses you or your use.
ShareAlike — If you remix, transform, or build upon the material, you must distribute your contributions under the same license as the original
No additional restrictions — You may not apply legal terms or technological measures that legally restrict others from doing anything the license permits
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.61842/swq/v1i1.2Keywords:
ekonomi syariah kompetensi mahkamah syari'ahAbstract
This article aims to investigate the competence of the Religious Courts in handling Islamic Economic cases. A significant change that recently occurred is the expansion of the Religious Court's jurisdiction in accordance with Law No. 3 of 2006, particularly concerning the handling of Islamic Economic cases in Indonesia. The Religious Courts are now authorized to handle cases related to Islamic financial services, including Islamic banking disputes. This amendment not only broadens the authority of the Religious Courts but also provides a clear scope for Islamic economic disputes. The scope extends beyond banking issues to include Islamic microfinance institutions, Islamic insurance, reinsurance, Islamic mutual funds, Islamic bonds, medium-term Islamic securities, Islamic securities, Islamic multifinance, Islamic pawnshops, and other Islamic financial institutions and businesses.
References
Gita Danupranata, Ekonomi Islam, cetakan I, Yogyakarta : UPFE-UMY,2006
Monser Kahf, Deskripsi Ekonomi Islam. Terj: Rifyal Ka’bah, Jakarta: Minaret, 1987
Rifyal Ka'bah, Penyelesaian Sengketa Ekonomi Syari'ah Sebagai Sebuah Kewenangan Baru Mahkamah syariah, dalam Varia Peradilan . tahun ke XXI, NOMOR245 April, 2006
Retnowulan Sutantio, Hukum Acara Pedata Dalam Teori dan Praktek, Bandung: Mandar Maju, 1989
Undang-undang No. 18 Tahun 2001 tentang Otonomi Khusus Bagi Provinsi Daerah Istimewa Aceh Sebagai Provinsi Nanggroe Aceh Darussalam
Undang-Undang Nomor 3 Tahun 2006
Undang-Undang Nomor 4 Tahun 2004 tentang Kekuasaan Kehakiman.
Undang-Undang Nomor 7 Tahun 1989 tentang Mahkamah syariah
UU No 3 Tahun 2006, tentang Perubahan atas Undang-Undang Nomor 7 Tahun 1989 tentang Mahkamah syariah
Yusuf Buchori, Litigasi Sengketa Perbankan Syari’ah Dalam Persektif Undang-Undang Nomor 3 Tahun 2006 Tentang Perubahan Atas Undang-Undang Nomor 7 tahun 1989 Tentang Mahkamah syariah (Study Kasus Putusan Pada Mahkamah syari’ah Purbalingga)” , Tesis MSI-UII Yogyakarta, 2007,
Downloads
Published
Statistic
- Read Counter : 219 Download : 198
Issue
Section
How to Cite
License
Copyright (c) 2023 Nazaruddin Nazaruddin
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
You are accessible to:
Share — copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format
Adapt — remix, transform, and build upon the material for any purpose, even commercially
Under the following terms:
Attribution — You must give appropriate credit, provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made. You may do so reasonably but not in any way that suggests the licensor endorses you or your use.
ShareAlike — If you remix, transform, or build upon the material, you must distribute your contributions under the same license as the original
No additional restrictions — You may not apply legal terms or technological measures that legally restrict others from doing anything the license permits
