Fuqaha' Perspective on Government Authority in Formulating Ta'zīr Penalty

Authors

Munadi Usman
Universitas Islam Negeri Sultanah Nahrasiyah Lhokseumawe , Indonesia
Abdullah Abdullah
Universitas Islam Negeri Sultanah Nahrasiyah Lhokseumawe , Indonesia
Kafrawi Kafrawi
Universitas Islam Negeri Sultanah Nahrasiyah Lhokseumawe , Indonesia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.61842/swq/v3i1.42

Keywords:

Fuqaha’ Goverment Ta’zir

Abstract

This research aims to examine the thoughts of the jurists regarding the formulation of ta'zīr by the government. So far, ta'zīr has been understood as a form of unlimited punishment; its determination does not refer to a standard rule. If a crime of ta'zīr occurs, the government undertakes ijtihad to determine the appropriate sentence for the act. Conditions like this are not relevant to the context of law enforcement today. This research uses two approaches as a basis for analysis: 1) socio-historical, namely understanding the formulation of ta'zīr criminal law carried out by fuqaha' from the past to the present period. 2) Content analysis, namely, analysis of fiqh texts and positive legal science. This step aims to obtain the basis or tools available from the scientific treasures to understand the formulation of the ta'zīr criminal law by the government. The research results show that ta'zīr is a criminal law concerning criminal acts and punishments which must go through a formulation process before being implemented. The ta'zīr penalty that is made must meet the criteria of a regulation that is suitable to be implemented

   References

‘Atiyah Mustafa Musyarrafah. Al-Qadha Fi Al-Islam. Syirkah al Syarq al Awsat.

Al Yasa’ Abubakar dan Marahalim. Hukum Pidana Islam di NAD. Banda Aceh: Dinas Syariat Islam, 2007.

A. Hanafi. Asas-Asas Hukum Pidana Islam. Jakarta: Bulan Bintang, 2003.

Abdul Azis Dahlan. Ensiklopedi Hukum Islam. Jakarta: Ichtiar Baru Van Hoeve, 2000.

Abdul Qadir ‘Awdah. Al-Tasyri' Al Jinai' Al Islami Muqaranah Bi Al Qanun Al Wad‘i. Beirut: Mu’assasah Al Risalah.

Abdurrahman al Jazīrī. Kitab Al Fiqh ‘Ala Al Mazhab Al Arba‘Ah. Beirut: Darul Fikr.

Ahmad Wardi Muslich. Pengantar dan Asas Hukum Pidana Islam. Jakarta: Sinar Grafika, 2003.

Bambang Poernomo. Asas-Asas Hukum Pidana. Jakarta: Ghalia Indonesia, 2021.

Bambang Sunggono. Metodologi Penelitian Hukum. Jakarta: Raja Grafindo Persada, 2019.

Cik Hasan Bisri. Model Penelitian Fiqh: Paradigma Penelitian Fiqh dan Fiqh Penelitian. Jakarta: Prenada Media, 2000.

Haliman. Hukum Pidana Syariat Islam Menurut Ajaran Ahlussunnah. Jakarta: Bulan Bintang, 2000.

Ibnu Taimiyah. As-Siyasah as-Syar’iyah. Kairo: Maktabah Anshar as-Sunnah al-Muhammadiyah.

Ishak al Syairazī. Al-Muhazzab Fi Fiqhi Mazhab Al-Imam Asy-Syafī‘. Beirut: Darul Fikr, 2000.

Jalaluddin Al Mahalli. Qalyubi wa ‘Amirah. Kairo: Darul Ihya Kutub Arabiyyah.

Luis Ma’luf. Al Munjid Fi Al Lughat Wa Al ‘Alam. Beirut: Darul Masyriq.

M. Abdul Mujied. Kamus Istilah Fikih. Jakarta: Pustaka Firdaus, 2003.

Mahmud Syaltut. Al-Islam ‘Aqidah wa Syariah. Kairo: Dar Al-Qalam.

Moeyatno. Asas-Asas Hukum Pidana. Jakarta: Rineka Cipta, 2008.

Muhammad Abu Zahrah. Al-Jarimah wa Al-‘Uqubah fi Al-Fiqh Al-Islamī. Beirut: Darul Fikr.

Muhammad Baltâji. Metodelogi Ijtihad Umar bin Khathab. Jakarta: Khalifa.

Muhammad bin Ismail Al Kahlani. Subulussalam. Jakarta: Diponegoro.

Muhammad Salim Al-’Awa. Fi Usul Al Nizham Al-Jina’i Al-Islamī. Kairo: Darul Ma’arif.

Munadi. “Qisās dan Hudūd serta Relevansinya dengan Hak Asasi Manusia.” Tahqiqa 1, no. 7 (2020): p. 20.

Rahmat Hakim. Hukum Pidana Islam. Jakarta: Bumi Aksara, 2004.

Al Suyuthi. Asybah wan Nadhair. Beirut: Darul Fikr.

Syahrizal. Dimensi Pemikiran Hukum dalam Implementasi Syariat Islam di Aceh. Banda Aceh: Dinas Syariat Islam, 2007.

Syarbainī al Khatib. Mughni Muhtaj ila Al-Ma’rifat Al-Ma‘ani Al-Alfadh Al-Minhaj. Kairo: Mustafa al Babi al Halabi wa Awladuh.

Downloads

Published

2025-06-25

   Statistic

Download data is not yet available.

   How to Cite

Usman, M., Abdullah Abdullah, & Kafrawi Kafrawi. (2025). Fuqaha’ Perspective on Government Authority in Formulating Ta’zīr Penalty. Siyasah Wa Qanuniyah : Jurnal Ilmiah Ma’had Aly Raudhatul Ma’arif, 3(1), 42–57. https://doi.org/10.61842/swq/v3i1.42